Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrick Zahraj vs Max Hans Rehberg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zahraj vs Rehberg analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Zahraj vs Max Hans Rehberg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zahraj 0 - 0 Rehberg
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 44.87% of points on his second serve, while Rehberg has won 52.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 54.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rehberg has won 50.86%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.78% and 30.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 56.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rehberg has saved 59.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 61.43% of matches played (W/L 43/ 27), with Rehberg winning 57.41% (W/L 31/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 48/ 34), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Rehberg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 22/ 18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.32% of matches (W/L 43/ 26), where as Rehberg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 119.33 while Rehberg has played against players with an average rank of 179.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rehberg has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 41.92% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rehberg has converted 41.26% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
791
Rank
787
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
432
Rank
382
High
20
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
58% (85-62)
Career Total W/L
53% (75-67)
58% (15-11)
YTD W/L
66% (19-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrick Zahraj | Max Hans Rehberg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (15/11) | 66% (19/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (33/27) | 61% (41/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (309/278) | 53% (359/320) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 56% (5/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 70% (14/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.32 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 107 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 128 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:34 | 1:50:9 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 158.65 | 127.28 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1082/1792) | 67% (1399/2100) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (737/1082) | 70% (982/1399) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (321/710) | 52% (368/701) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (84/197) | 41% (85/206) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (769/1807) | 38% (829/2179) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (15/10) | 72% (13/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 56% (10/18) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 86% (14/12) | 100% (14/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 0% (14/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 33% (15/5) |
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Jerome Kym
Player
Patrick Zahraj
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
37 of
74)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Michele Ribecai
55%
(
47 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
58 of
109)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
10
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Mariano Tammaro
64%
(
61 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
40 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
94
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Omni Kumar
Player
Patrick Zahraj
64%
(
59 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
47%
(
43 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Vincent Marysko
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Matyas Cerny
69%
(
70 of
102)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
1
Aces
0
15
Double Faults
3
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
34%
(
11 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
82)
97
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Hans Rehberg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Otto Virtanen
64%
(
75 of
117)
1st Serve %
46%
(
56 of
122)
1
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
15
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
50 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
120
|
6-7(4) 7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Sorger
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
55
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Evan Furness
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
43%
(
31 of
72)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
John Sperle
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
79)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
79)
90
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Julius Seifert
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
73%
(
61 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Zahraj Vs Rehberg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
